“A New Beginning”. Obama’s Speech in Cairo

“A New Beginning”. Obama’s Speech in Cairo

04.06.2009 La rédaction

In this speech, Barack Obama talks in Cairo about closer ties between the Muslims and the United States. Despite the required expressions of good will, many have considered that this speech also paves the way for closer ties between the American administration and the Muslim Brothers.

I am honoured to be in the timeless city of Cairo and to be hosted by two remarkable institutions. For over a thousand years, al-Azhar has, had stood as a beacon of Islamic learning. And for over a century, Cairo University has been a source of Egypt’s advancement. Together, you represent the harmony between tradition and progress.
I’m grateful for your hospitality and the hospitality of the people of Egypt. And I’m also proud to carry with me the good will of the American people and a greeting of peace from Muslim communities in my country: Assalamu Alaikum.

We meet at a time of great tension between the United States and Muslims around the world, tension rooted in historical forces that go beyond any current policy debate. The relationship between Islam and the West includes centuries of coexistence and cooperation but also conflict and religious wars.

More recently, tension has been fed by colonialism that denied rights and opportunities to many Muslims and a Cold War in which Muslim majority countries were too often treated as proxies without regard to their own aspirations. Moreover, the sweeping change brought by modernity and globalisation led many Muslims to view the West as hostile to the traditions of Islam.

Violent extremists have exploited these tensions in a small but potent minority of Muslims. The attacks of September 11, 2001, and the continued efforts of these extremists to engage in violence against civilians has led some in my country to view Islam as inevitably hostile not only to America and Western countries but also to human rights.

All this has bred more fear and more mistrust. So long as our relationship is defined by our differences, we will empower those who sow hatred rather than peace, those who promote conflict rather than the cooperation that can help all of our people achieve justice and prosperity. And this cycle of suspicion and discord must end.

I’ve come here to Cairo to seek a new beginning between the United States and Muslims around the world, one based on mutual interest and mutual respect, and one based upon the truth that America and Islam are not exclusive and need not be in competition. Instead, they overlap and share common principles, principles of justice and progress, tolerance and the dignity of all human beings.

I do so recognizing that change cannot happen overnight. I know there’s been a lot of publicity about this speech, but no single speech can eradicate years of mistrust nor can I answer in the time that I have this afternoon all the complex questions that brought us to this point.

But I am convinced that in order to move forward, we must say openly to each other the things we hold in our hearts and that too often are said only behind closed doors. There must be a sustained effort to listen to each other, to learn from each other, to respect one another, and to seek common ground.

As the holy Koran tells us: “Be conscious of God and speak always the truth.”

That is what I will try to do today, to speak the truth as best I can. Humbled by the task before us and firm in my belief that the interests we share as human beings are far more powerful than the forces that drive us apart.

Now, part of this conviction is rooted in my own experience. I’m a Christian. But my father came from a Kenyan family that includes generations of Muslims. As a boy, I spent several years in Indonesia and heard the call of the azaan at the break of dawn and at the fall of dusk.

As a young man, I worked in Chicago communities where many found dignity and peace in their Muslim faith. As a student of history, I also know civilization’s debt to Islam. It was Islam at places like al-Azhar that carried the light of learning through so many centuries, paving the way for Europe’s Renaissance and Enlightenment. It was innovation in Muslim communities…

It was innovation in Muslim communities that developed the order of algebra, our magnetic compass and tools of navigation, our mastery of pens and printing, our understanding of how disease spreads and how it can be healed. Islamic culture has given us majestic arches and soaring spires, timeless poetry and cherished music, elegant calligraphy and places of peaceful contemplation. And throughout history, Islam has demonstrated through words and deeds the possibilities of religious tolerance and racial equality.

I also know that Islam has always been a part of America’s story. The first nation to recognize my country was Morocco. In signing the Treaty of Tripoli in 1796, our second president, John Adams, wrote:

“The United States has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion or tranquillity of Muslims.”

And since our founding, American Muslims have enriched the United States. They have fought in our wars. They have served in our government. They have stood for civil rights. They have started businesses. They have taught at our universities. They’ve excelled in our sports arenas. They’ve won Nobel Prizes, built our tallest building and lit the Olympic torch. And when the first Muslim American was recently elected to Congress, he took the oath to defend our Constitution using the same holy Koran that one of our founding fathers, Thomas Jefferson, kept in his personal library.

So I have known Islam on three continents before coming to the region where it was first revealed. That experience guides my conviction that partnership between America and Islam must be based on what Islam is, not what it isn’t. And I consider it part of my responsibility as president of the United States to fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they appear.

But that same principle must apply to Muslim perceptions of America. Just as…

Just as Muslims do not fit a crude stereotype, America is not the crude stereotype of a self-interested empire. The United States has been one of the greatest sources of progress that the world has ever known. We were born out of revolution against an empire.

We were founded upon the ideal that all are created equal. And we have shed blood and struggled for centuries to give meaning to those words, within our borders and around the world.

We are shaped by every culture. Drawn from every end of the Earth, and dedicated to a simple concept, E pluribus unum: Out of many, one.

Now much has been made of the fact that an African-American with the name Barack Hussein Obama could be elected president.

But my personal story is not so unique. The dream of opportunity for all people has not come true for everyone in America, but its promise exists for all who come to our shores. And that includes nearly 7 million American Muslims in our country today who, by the way, enjoy incomes and educational levels that are higher than the American average.

Moreover, freedom in America is indivisible from the freedom to practice one’s religion. That is why there is a mosque in every state in our union and over 1,200 mosques within our borders. That’s why the United States government has gone to court to protect the right of women and girls to wear the hijab, and to punish those who would deny it.

So let there be no doubt…
… let there be no doubt, Islam is a part of America. And I believe that America holds within her the truth that regardless of race, religion, or station in life, all of us share common aspirations: to live in peace and security, to get an education and to work with dignity, to love our families, our communities, and our God. These things we share. This is the hope of all humanity.

Of course, recognizing our common humanity is only the beginning of our task. Words alone cannot meet the needs of our people. These needs will be met only if we act boldly in the years ahead. And if we understand that the challenges we face are shared and our failure to meet them will hurt us all.

For we have learned from recent experience that when a financial system weakens in one country, prosperity is hurt everywhere. When a new flu infects one human being, all are at risk. When one nation pursues a nuclear weapon, the risk of nuclear attack rises for all nations.

When violent extremists operate in one stretch of mountains, people are endangered across an ocean. When innocents in Bosnia and Darfur are slaughtered, that is a stain on our collective conscience.

That is what it means to share this world in the 21st Century. That is the responsibility we have to one another as human beings. This is a difficult responsibility to embrace, for human history has often been a record of nations and tribes, and, yes, religions subjugating one another in pursuit of their own interests.

Yet in this new age, such attitudes are self-defeating. Given our interdependence, any world order that elevates one nation or group of people over another will inevitably fail. So whatever we think of the past, we must not be prisoners to it. Our problems must be dealt with through partnership, our progress must be shared.
Now, that does not mean we should ignore sources of tension. Indeed, it suggests the opposite. We must face these tensions squarely. And so, in that spirit, let me speak as clearly and as plainly as I can about some specific issues that I believe we must finally confront together.

The first issue that we have to confront is violent extremism in all its forms. In Ankara, I made clear that America is not and never will be at war with Islam.

We will, however, relentlessly confront violent extremists who pose a grave threat to our security because we reject the same thing that people of all faiths reject, the killing of innocent men, women and children. And it is my first duty as president to protect the American people.

The situation in Afghanistan demonstrates America’s goals and our need to work together. Over seven years ago, the United States pursued al-Qaeda and the Taliban with broad international support. We did not go by choice. We went because of necessity. I’m aware that there’s still some who would question or even justify the offense of 9/11. But let us be clear. Al-Qaeda killed nearly 3,000 people on that day.

The victims were innocent men, women and children from America and many other nations who had done nothing to harm anybody. And yet al-Qaeda chose to ruthlessly murder these people, claimed credit for the attack, and even now states their determination to kill on a massive scale. They have affiliates in many countries and are trying to expand their reach.

These are not opinions to be debated. These are facts to be dealt with. Make no mistake, we do not want to keep our troops in Afghanistan. We see no military – we seek no military bases there. It is agonizing for America to lose our young men and women. It is costly and politically difficult to continue this conflict.

We would gladly bring every single one of our troops home if we could be confident that there were not violent extremists in Afghanistan, and now Pakistan, determined to kill as many Americans as they possibly can. But that is not yet the case.

And that’s why we’re partnering with a coalition of 46 countries. And despite the costs involved, America’s commitment will not weaken. Indeed, none of us should tolerate these extremists. They have killed in many countries. They have killed people of different faiths but, more than any other, they have killed Muslims. Their actions are irreconcilable with the rights of human beings, the progress of nations, and with Islam.

The holy Koran teaches that whoever kills an innocent is as – it is as it if has killed all mankind.

And the holy Koran also says whoever saves a person, it is as if he has saved all mankind.

The enduring faith of over a billion people is so much bigger than the narrow hatred of a few. Islam is not part of the problem in combating violent extremism; it is an important part of promoting peace.

Now, we also know that military power alone is not going solve the problems in Afghanistan and Pakistan. That’s why we plan to invest $1.5 billion each year over the next five years to partner with Pakistanis to build schools and hospitals, roads and businesses, and hundreds of millions to help those who’ve been displaced.

That’s why we are providing more than $2.8 billion to help Afghans develop their economy and deliver services that people depend on.

Now, let me also address the issue of Iraq. Unlike Afghanistan, Iraq was a war of choice that provoked strong differences in my country and around the world. Although I believe that the Iraqi people are ultimately better off without the tyranny of Saddam Hussein, I also believe that events in Iraq have reminded America of the need to use diplomacy and build international consensus to resolve our problems whenever possible.

Indeed, we can recall the words of Thomas Jefferson, who said: “I hope that our wisdom will grow with our power and teach us that the less we use our power, the greater it will be.”

Today America has a dual responsibility to help Iraq forge a better future and to leave Iraq to Iraqis. I have made it clear to the Iraqi people…

I have made it clear to the Iraqi people that we pursue no basis and no claim on their territory or resources. Iraq’s sovereignty is its own. And that’s why I ordered the removal of our combat brigades by next August. That is why we will honour our agreement with Iraq’s democratically-elected government to remove combat troops from Iraqi cities by July and to remove all of our troops from Iraq by 2012.

We will help Iraq train its security forces and develop its economy. But we will support a secure and united Iraq as a partner and never as a patron.

And finally, just as America can never tolerate violence by extremists, we must never alter or forget our principles. 9/11 was an enormous trauma to our country. The fear and anger that it provoked was understandable. But in some cases, it led us to act contrary to our traditions and our ideals.

We are taking concrete actions to change course. I have unequivocally prohibited the use of torture by the United States. And I have ordered the prison at Guantanamo Bay closed by early next year.

So America will defend itself, respectful of the sovereignty of nations and the rule of law. And we will do so in partnership with Muslim communities, which are also threatened. The sooner the extremists are isolated and unwelcome in Muslim communities, the sooner we will all be safer.

Now, the second major source of tension that we need to discuss is the situation between Israelis, Palestinians and the Arab world. America’s strong bonds with Israel are well-known. This bond is unbreakable. It is based upon cultural and historical ties and the recognition that the aspiration for a Jewish homeland is rooted in a tragic history that cannot be denied.

Around the world the Jewish people were persecuted for centuries. And anti-Semitism in Europe culminated in an unprecedented Holocaust. Tomorrow I will visit Buchenwald, which was part of a network of camps where Jews were enslaved, tortured, shot and gassed to death by the Third Reich.

Six million Jews were killed, more than the entire Jewish population of Israel today. Denying that fact is baseless. It is ignorant, and it is hateful.

Threatening Israel with destruction or repeating vile stereotypes about Jews is deeply wrong and only serves to evoke in the minds of the Israelis this most painful of memories while preventing the peace that the people of this region deserve.

On the other hand, it is also undeniable that the Palestinian people, Muslims and Christians, have suffered in pursuit of a homeland. For more than 60 years, they’ve endured the pain of dislocation.

Many wait in refugee camps in the West Bank and Gaza and neighbouring lands for a life of peace and security that they have never been able to lead. They endure the daily humiliations, large and small, that come with occupation.

So let there be no doubt, the situation for the Palestinian people is intolerable. And America will not turn our backs on the legitimate Palestinian aspiration for dignity, opportunity and a state of their own.

For decades, then, there has been a stalemate. Two peoples with legitimate aspirations, each with a painful history that makes compromise elusive. It’s easy to point fingers.

For Palestinians to point to the displacement brought about by Israel’s founding and for Israelis to point to the constant hostility and attacks throughout its history, from within its borders as well as beyond.

But if we see this conflict only from one side or the other, then we will be blind to the truth. The only resolution is for the aspirations of both sides to be met through two states, where Israelis and Palestinians each live in peace and security.

That is in Israel’s interests, Palestine’s interests, America’s interests and the world’s interests. And that’s why I intend to personally pursue this outcome with all of the patience and dedication that the task requires.

The obligations – the obligations that the parties have agreed to under the Road Map are clear. For peace to come, it is time for them and all of us to live up to our responsibilities.

Palestinians must abandon violence. Resistance through violence and killing is wrong and it does not succeed. For centuries, black people in America suffered the lash of the whip as slaves and the humiliation of segregation. But it was not violence that won full and equal rights. It was a peaceful and determined insistence upon the ideals at the centre of America’s founding.

This same story can be told by people from South Africa to South Asia, to Eastern Europe to Indonesia. It’s a story with a simple truth: violence is a dead end. It is a sign neither of courage nor power to shoot rockets at sleeping children or to blow up old women on a bus. That’s not how moral authority is claimed, that’s how it is surrendered.

Now is the time for Palestinians to focus on what they can build. The Palestinian Authority must develop its capacity to govern with institutions that serve the needs of its people.

Hamas does have support among some Palestinians, but they also have to recognize they have responsibilities, to play a role in fulfilling Palestinian aspirations, to unify the Palestinian people, Hamas must put an end to violence, recognize past agreements, recognize Israel’s right to exist.

At the same time, Israelis must acknowledge that just as Israel’s right to exist cannot be denied, neither can Palestine’s. The United States does not accept the legitimacy of continued Israeli settlements.

This construction violates previous agreements and undermines efforts to achieve peace. It is time for these settlements to stop.

And Israel must also live up to its obligation to ensure that Palestinians can live and work and develop their society. Just as it devastates Palestinian families, the continuing humanitarian crisis in Gaza does not serve Israel’s security, neither does the continuing lack of opportunity in the West Bank.

Progress in the daily lives of the Palestinian people must be a critical part of a road to peace. And Israel must take concrete steps to enable such progress.

And, finally, the Arab states must recognize that the Arab Peace Initiative was an important beginning, but not the end of their responsibility. The Arab-Israeli conflict should no longer be used to distract the people of Arab nations from other problems. Instead, it must be a cause for action to help the Palestinian people develop the institutions that will sustain their state, to recognize Israel’s legitimacy and to choose progress over a self-defeating focus on the past.

America will align our policies with those who pursue peace, and we will say in public what we say in private to Israelis and Palestinians and Arabs.

We cannot impose peace. But privately, many Muslims recognize that Israel will not go away. Likewise, many Israelis recognize the need for a Palestinian state.

It is time for us to act on what everyone knows to be true. Too many tears have been shed, too much blood has been shed.

All of us have a responsibility to work for the day when the mothers of Israelis and Palestinians could, can see their children grow up without fear, when the holy land of the three great faiths is the place of peace that God intended it to be, when Jerusalem is a secure and lasting home for Jews and Christians and Muslims and a place for all of the children of Abraham to mingle peacefully together as in the story of Isra – as in the story of Isra, when Moses, Jesus, and Mohammed – peace be upon them – joined in prayer.

The third source of tension is our shared interest in the rights and responsibilities of nations on nuclear weapons. This issue has been a source of tension between the United States and the Islamic Republic of Iran. For many years, Iran has defined itself, in part, by its opposition to my country. And there is, in fact, a tumultuous history between us.

In the middle of the Cold War, the United States played a role in the overthrow of a democratically elected Iranian government. Since the Islamic revolution, Iran has played a role in acts of hostage taking and violence against US troops and civilians. This history is well known.

Rather than remain trapped in the past, I’ve made it clear to Iran’s leaders and people that my country is prepared to move forward. The question now is not what Iran is against but, rather, what future it wants to build.

I recognize it will be hard to overcome decades of mistrust, but we will proceed with courage, rectitude, and resolve. There will be many issues to discussion between our two countries, and we are willing to move forward without preconditions on the basis of mutual respect.

But it is clear to all concerned that when it comes to nuclear weapons, we have reached a decisive point. This is not simply about America’s interests.

It’s about preventing a nuclear arms race in the Middle East that could lead this region and the world down a hugely dangerous path.

Now, I understand those who protest that some countries have weapons that others do not. No single nations should pick and choose which nation holds nuclear weapons. And that’s why I strongly reaffirmed America’s commitment to seek a world in which no nations hold nuclear weapons.

And any nation, including Iran, should have the right to access peaceful nuclear power if it complies with its responsibilities under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. That commitment is at the core of the treaty. And it must be kept for all who fully abide by it. And I am hopeful that all countries in the region can share in this goal.

The fourth issue that I will address is democracy.

I know there has been controversy about the promotion of democracy in recent years. And much of this controversy is connected to the war in Iraq. So let me be clear. No system of government can or should be imposed by one nation by any other. That does not lessen my commitment, however, to governments that reflect the will of the people.

Each nation gives life to this principle in its own way, grounded in the traditions of its own people. America does not presume to know what is best for everyone, just as we would not presume to pick the outcome of a peaceful election.

But I do have an unyielding belief that all people yearn for certain things: the ability to speak your mind and have a say in how you are governed, confidence in the rule of law and the equal administration of justice, government that is transparent and doesn’t steal from the people, the freedom to live as you choose. These are not just American ideas. They are human rights. And that is why we will support them everywhere.

Now, there is no straight line to realize this promise. But this much is clear. Governments that protect these rights are ultimately more stable, successful and secure. Suppressing ideas never succeeds in making them go away. America respects the right of all peaceful and law-abiding voices to be heard around the world, even if we disagree with them. And we will welcome all elected, peaceful governments, provided they govern with respect for all their people.

This last point is important because there are some who advocate for democracy only when they’re out of power. Once in power, they are ruthless in suppressing the rights of others.

So no matter where it takes hold, government of the people and by the people sets a single standard for all who would hold power. You must maintain your power through consent, not coercion. You must respect the rights of minorities and participate with a spirit of tolerance and compromise. You must place the interests of your people and the legitimate workings of the political process above your party.

Without these ingredients, elections alone do not make true democracy.

Thank you.

The fifth issue that we must address together is religious freedom. Islam has a proud tradition of tolerance. We see it in the history of Andalusia and Cordoba during the Inquisition. I saw it first-hand as a child in Indonesia where devout Christians worshipped freely in an overwhelmingly Muslim country.

That is the spirit we need today. People in every country should be free to choose and live their faith based upon the persuasion of the mind and the heart and the soul.

This tolerance is essential for religion to thrive. But it’s being challenged in many different ways. Among some Muslims, there’s a disturbing tendency to measure one’s own faith by the rejection of somebody else’s faith.

The richness of religious diversity must be upheld, whether it is for Maronites in Lebanon or the Copts in Egypt.

And if we are being honest, fault lines must be closed among Muslims as well as the divisions between Sunni and Shia have led to tragic violence, particularly in Iraq.

Freedom of religion is central to the ability of peoples to live together. We must always examine the ways in which people protect it. For instance, in the United States, rules on charitable giving have made it harder for Muslims to fulfil their religious obligation.

That’s why I’m committed to work with American Muslims to ensure that they can fulfil zakat. Likewise, it is important for Western countries to avoid impeding Muslim citizens from practising religion as they see fit, for instance, by dictating what clothes a Muslim woman should wear.

We can’t disguise hostility towards any religion behind the pretence of liberalism. In fact, faith should bring us together. And that’s why we’re forging service projects in America to bring together Christians, Muslims and Jews.

That’s why we welcome efforts like Saudi Arabian King Abdullah’s interfaith dialogue and Turkey’s leadership in the Alliance of Civilizations.

Around the world, we can turn dialogue into interfaith service so bridges between peoples lead to action, whether it is combating malaria in Africa or providing relief after a natural disaster.

The sixth issue – the sixth issue that I want to address is women’s rights.

I know, and you can tell from this audience, that there is a healthy debate about this issue. I reject the view of some in the West that a woman who chooses to cover her hair is somehow less equal. But I do believe that a woman who is denied an education is denied equality.

And it is no coincidence that countries where women are well-educated are far more likely to be prosperous.

Now let me be clear, issues of women’s equality are by no means simply an issue for Islam. In Turkey, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Indonesia, we’ve seen Muslim-majority countries elect a woman to lead.

Meanwhile, the struggle for women’s equality continues in many aspects of American life and in countries around the world. I am convinced that our daughters can contribute just as much to society as our sons.

Our common prosperity will be advanced by allowing all humanity, men and women, to reach their full potential. I do not believe that women must make the same choices as men in order to be equal. And I respect those women who choose to live their lives in traditional roles. But it should be their choice.

That is why the United States will partner with any Muslim-majority country to support expanded literacy for girls and to help young women pursue employment through micro-financing that helps people live their dreams.

Finally, I want to discuss economic development and opportunity. I know that for many, the face of globalisation is contradictory. The Internet and television can bring knowledge and information but also offensive sexuality and mindless violence into the home.

Trade can bring new wealth and opportunities but also huge disruptions and change in communities. In all nations, including America, this change can bring fear; fear that, because of modernity, we lose control over our economic choices, our politics, and most importantly, our identities, those things we most cherish about our communities, our families, our traditions and our faith.

But I also know that human progress cannot be denied. There need not be contradictions between development and tradition. Countries like Japan and South Korea grew their economies enormously while maintaining distinct cultures. The same is true for the astonishing progress within Muslim majority countries from Kuala Lumpur to Dubai.

In ancient times and in our times, Muslim communities have been at the forefront of innovation and education. And this is important because no development strategy can be based only upon what comes out of the ground nor can it be sustained while young people are out of work.

Many Gulf States have enjoyed great wealth as a consequence of oil, and some are beginning to focus it on broader development. But all of us must recognize that education and innovation will be the currency of the 21st century. And in too…

And in too many Muslim communities, there remains underinvestment in these areas. I am emphasizing such investment within my own country. And while America, in the past, has focused on oil and gas when it comes to this part of the world, we new seek a broader engagement.

On education, we will expand change programs and increase scholarships like the one that brought my father to America.

At the same time, we will encourage more Americans to study in Muslim communities. And we will match promising Muslim students with internships in America, invest in online learning for teachers and children around the world and create a new, online network so a young person in Kansas can communicate instantly with a young person in Cairo.

On economic development, we will create a new core of business volunteers to partner with counterparts in Muslim majority countries. And I will host a summit on entrepreneurship this year to identify how we can deepen ties between business leaders, foundations and social entrepreneurs in the United States and Muslim communities around the world.

On science and technology, we will launch a new fund to support technological development in Muslim majority country and to help transfer ideas to the marketplace so they can create more jobs. We will open centres of scientific excellence in Africa, the Middle East and Southeast Asia and appoint new science envoys to collaborate on programs that develop new sources of energy, create green jobs, digitize records, clean water, grow new crops.

Today, I’m announcing a new global effort with the organization of the Islamic Conference to eradicate polio. And we will also expand partnerships with Muslim communities to promote child and maternal health.

All these things must be done in partnership. Americans are ready to join with citizens and governments, community organizations, religious leaders, and businesses in Muslim communities around the world to help our people pursue a better life.

The issues that I have described will not be easy to address, but we have a responsibility to join together to behalf of the world that we seek, a world where extremists no longer threaten our people and American troops have come home; a world where Israelis and Palestinians are each secure in a state of their own and nuclear energy is used for peaceful purposes, a world where governments serve their citizens and the rights of all God’s children are respected. Those are mutual interests. That is the world we seek. But we can only achieve it together. I know there are many, Muslim and non-Muslim, who question whether we can forge this new beginning. Some are eager to stoke the flames of division and to stand in the way of progress. Some suggest that it isn’t worth the effort, that we are fated to disagree and civilizations are doomed to clash.

Many more are simply sceptical that real change can occur. There is so much fear, so much mistrust that has built up over the years. But if we choose to be bound by the past, we will never move forward. And I want to particularly say this to young people of every faith in every country. You more than anyone have the ability to reimagine the world, the remake this world.

All of us share this world for but a brief moment in time. The question is whether we spend that time focused on what pushes us apart or whether we commit ourselves to an effort, a sustained effort to find common ground, to focus on the future we seek for our children and to respect the dignity of all human beings.

It’s easier to start wars than to end them. It’s easier to blame others than to look inward. It’s easier to see what is different about someone than to find the things we share. But we should choose the right path, not just the easy path. There is one rule that lies at the heart of every religion, that we do unto others as we would have them do unto us.

This truth transcends nations and peoples, a belief that isn’t new, that isn’t black or white or brown, that isn’t Christian or Muslim or Jew. It’s a belief that pulsed in the cradle of civilization and that still beats in the hearts of billions around the world. It’s a faith in other people. And it’s what brought me here today.

We have the power to make the world we seek, but only if we have the courage to make a new beginning, keeping in mind what has been written. The holy Koran tells us: “Mankind, we have created you male and a female. And we have made you into nations and tribes so that you may know one another.”

The Talmud tells us: “The whole of the Torah is for the purpose of promoting peace.”

The holy Bible tells us: “Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called sons of God.”

The people of the world can live together in peace. We know that is God’s vision. Now that must be our work here on Earth.

Thank you. And may God’s peace be upon you. Thank you very much.

Thank you.

This post is also available in Français .

News

Strong word in private between Abu Dhabi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Zayed and the US

Strong word in private between Abu Dhabi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Zayed and the US 25.02.2009 La rédaction

Below, are diplomatic cables revealed by Wikileaks. They were sent by US ambassadors to their colleagues and/or to the US State Department. 

We are aware that these were meant to be private conversations and by making them public Wikileaks violates their author’s and other people’s privacy. We chose to publish them anyway on this website because they show the evolution of the United State‘s position concerning the Muslim Brotherhood

We do consider them as historical documents and publish them as such, we will therefore not reproduce any confidential cables leaked after 2010. 1. (S/NF) Summary: On the margins of Abu Dhabi’s largest defense exhibition (IDEX), Abu Dhabi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Zayed (MbZ) engaged visiting US dignitaries with strident remarks about Iran and Qatar‘s dangerous ties to extremist elements (including Iran and the Muslim Brotherhood). He stated flatly that Qatar is allied with the Brotherhood (posited as the UAEG‘s mortal enemy) and clearly betrayed the GCC by inviting Iran to the January “Arab” summit. MbZ cited his own desire to defend his country as a counterpoint to extremists’ loyalty to their “movement” as opposed to their constituent population. He expressed skepticism about the ability of the GCC to cooperate in the military sphere, and urged the US to work with individual countries bilaterally as a way of moving the process forward. Praising the UAE Air Force in ensuring national defense, he said his officers had instructions to find and be ready to stamp out Iranian missiles. He was morbidly confident that Israel would attempt a military strike on Iran this year, likely provoking Tehran to lash out at proximate targets like the UAE (identified as a partner of Israel‘s U.S. ally). He was also harsh on Russia‘s role in the region, as it followed its hero (Putin) in citing its villain (America) as the source of its woes. He predicted unhelpful cooperation between Moscow and Tehran. Closing the meeting on a more upbeat note, MbZ was pleased with the assurance that the U.S. Navy was in the Gulf and hoped it would remain here for generations. End summary. 2. (C) During the bi-annual International Defence Exhibition 2009 (IDEX) held in Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi Crown Prince, Mohammed bin Zayed al Nahyan (MbZ) met with the official US Delegation, US Ambassador Richard Olson, US Defense Attache colonel Bret Rider and Chief US Liaison Office Colonel David Sprague on site at IDEX. Key members of the US delegation consisted of VADM William Gortney (CDR NAVCENT), Mr. Keith Webster (DASA/DE&C), Ms. Beth McCormick (Dep Dir DSCA), BG Genaro Dellerocco (USA PEO Missiles & Space), BG Michael Terry (CDR USASAC), and RDML Steven Voetsch (A/SECNAV/IP). The discussions were broad-ranging but typically centered on, or arose in conjunction with, naval operations in the Arabian Gulf. As is usually the case, Iran was the true center of the discussion. Qatar aligned with the Muslim Brotherhood —————————————– 3. (S/NF) Perhaps the most revealing part of the discussion was on the subject of Qatar, as it relates to Iran. MbZ asked note-takers on both sides to stop writing and to keep his comments off the record as he stated that Qatar is “part of the Muslim Brotherhood.” He encouraged the US to review the employees of Al Jazeera and predicted we’d find 90% of the staff affiliated with the Brotherhood. When Qatar invited Iran to the Arab League meeting (January 16), MbZ saw that as a betrayal of the first caliber. He stated he knows Hamid bin Khalifa and Hamid bin Jasim well and he could not understand why they would betray fellow Arabs unless they were beholden to the Muslim Brothers. He cited as proof of Qatari perfidy that Doha gave Hamas and Hizballah $930 million. He asked rhetorically why else would an Arab leader support movements like this unless they were part of the movement. 4. (S/NF) In a further example linking Iran and Qatar, MbZ told the story of the Moroccan Foreign Minister who received a call from Iran. The FM was directed (by Iran) to work with Doha and agree with what they propose. The FM told the Iranian that he would listen to his boss, the King of Morocco, and not a Persian who had no say in the matter. (Comment: the real point of the story was to illustrate the inroads that Iran has already made into the Arab League thanks to Qatar. End comment.) 5. (S/NF) The discussion on Qatar led to a broader MbZ condemnation of the Muslim Brotherhood movement and its affect on the region. (Being labeled a Muslim Brother is about the worst epithet possible in MBZ vocabulary.) He sees Iranian influence in the Brotherhood very clearly as both a way to agitate the Arab populace and render the traditional leaders of Arab society impotent. MbZ spoke of Hamas and Hizballah in the same breath and grouped them with UBL as transnational threats posing as national movements. He used the story of Khalid Mishal‘s visit to Egypt as the most recent example of nefarious intent. Mishal was invited on an official visit by President Hosni Mubarak, including arrangements for housing Mishal in the fashion he accords national leaders. Mishal reportedly rejected the offer and told Mubarak that he would stay with “his boss,” the leader of the outlawed Muslim Brotherhood and avowed enemy of Mubarak. “Why was the leader of a Palestinian faction calling the leader of an Egyptian terrorist organization his boss?” Borders and nations do not matter to these people, said MbZ, just the movement. On the other hand, the UAE as a nation is very important to MbZ and he sees it as his duty to maintain its integrity. GCC cohesion a myth ——————- 6. (S) Admiral Gortney talked of military coalitions and multinational exercises as a way to prepare for unforeseen eventualities, especially as regards Iran. MbZ was very quick to respond that he had tried to forge GCC cohesion for “27 years” and failed. “I am not a believer in grouping the GCC together…ask us who wants to be involved and we will step forward, the others will take a step back.” “Encourage those of us who wish to lead to lead and we will; sooner or later the others will step forward but only when it is necessary.” The message was very clear: the UAE should be should be dealt with bilaterally by the US, not as a constituent part of the GCC or Arab world. Additionally, he suggested the US is wasting its time trying to get the other members of the GCC to cooperate in the common interest, when that is not the primary motivation of most GCC states. Admiral Gortney thanked MbZ for the UAE Navy’s plans to command CTF 152 later this year. This is a clear indication the UAE will lead when given the opportunity. The UAE‘s leadership of the CTF will convince those who are not committed to the coalition to join and support this key effort in the Arabian Gulf. Extremists prey on young minds prone to fantasy ——————————————— — 7. (C) MbZ stated the UAE has two enemies, Iran and terrorism. It is important to him that when one side of a partnership has information on either of these threats they must share it for the common good of both. He told the story of his son who was becoming interested in the teachings of Muslim fundamentalists; he sent his son on a humanitarian mission to Ethiopia but not with the Red Crescent, rather with the Red Cross. His son returned from the mission with his vision of the west intact and in fact corrected. He was astonished that the Christians with the Red Cross were giving food and support to anyone who needed the support, not just to Christians. His son had only heard the stories of the west through the lens of Al Jazeera and others similarly aligned. In a message often heard from MbZ he stressed that no true religion tells anyone to kill innocents. No true religion tells anyone to be a suicide bomber. The fantasy of being a martyr for Islam and riding a golden chariot to heaven to live in a 7-star hotel to be waited on by 70 virgins is just that, a fantasy exploited by extremists. Strengthening defenses — against Iran‘s missiles ——————————————— —- 8. (S/NF) MbZ spoke proudly of his Air Force and its role in the nation’s defense. He stated “this is the Middle East and we will do what we need to do…when the Iranians fire their missiles we will go after them and kill them.” He said he feels the worst thing he can do as a leader is to allow the Iranians to attack his people and then to have no answer when young Emiratis ask “what are you going to do?” He stated with some certainty this is the year the Israelis will attack Iran. He believes Iran will have two possible courses of action; sit back and do nothing, and have the world so thoroughly condemn the actions of Israel that Iran becomes the hero for not responding to an “unprovoked” attack. MbZ feels the more likely Iranian reaction to an Israeli attack would be to let loose its missiles on the allies of those who support Israel (i.e., close partners of the U.S.). He sees the UAE at the top of the Iranian target list. MbZ told Admiral Gortney that he has directed his Armed Forces Chief of Staff (COS) to find the missiles now and draw up plans to kill them. The COS was directed to work with the Americans so the UAE‘s jets have the corridors and experience needed to make the kill. (Note: Septel reports the COS‘s appeal for urgent deployment of Patriot batteries in the UAE. End note.) Down on Russia <————– 9. (S/NF) After Ambassador delivered ref B points, MbZ spoke of the destabilizing effect of the Russians particularly in light of the purported S-300 missile sale to Iran. He said Russians are very difficult to convince of anything. Russians need two things, a hero and a villain. They now have a hero in Putin and they are once again making America the villain. MbZ recalled that Putin announced in 2008 that Russia had huge financial reserves and would not suffer under the economic collapse, but now the reserves are gone. The Russian “hero” tells his people daily that America is the reason for the high price of bread in Moscow, America is the reason for the low price of oil, etc. MbZ said 2009 will be a very bad year for Russia, whose people will turn to their hero more and more. He thinks we need to control the Russians but said he is not well versed in dealing with Russia — America knows how to deal with Russia from past experience and America must deal with Russia now. Russia will be the biggest winner of any instability in the Gulf; Iran will use Russia to re-build after Israel attacks. MbZ asked Ambassador for his assessment of Russian intentions, Ambassador described the challenges the US had faced in dealing with Russia since Putin‘s 2007 speech at the Munich Security Conference. Upbeat on the U.S. Naval presence ——————————— 10. (C) The meeting ended as it started, with MbZ as the gracious and upbeat host wishing his guests well and wishing American business the greatest successes during IDEX. His mood was relaxed and confident and looking to the future. When Admiral Gortney noted that the US Navy has been here in the Gulf for 60 years, MbZ commented that he’s been hearing that for over 40 years and his fondest hope is that he continues to hear that for 40 more — and that his children will hear the same message from America. 11. (SBU) Vice Admiral William Gortney, Commander NAVCENT, cleared this cable prior to its transmission. OLSON STRONG WORDS IN PRIVATE FROM MBZ AT IDEX — BASHES IRAN, QATAR, RUSSIA Date: 2009 February 25, 12:50 (Wednesday) Canonical ID: 09ABUDHABI193_a Original Classification: SECRET,NOFORN Current Classification: SECRET,NOFORN Handling Restrictions — Not Assigned — Character Count: 11467 Executive Order: — Not Assigned — Locator: TEXT ONLINE TAGS:AE – United Arab Emirates | IR – Iran |MASS – Military and Defense Affairs–Military Assistance and Sales |MOPS – Military and Defense Affairs–Military Operations | PARM – Political Affairs–Arms Controls and Disarmament | PREL – Political Affairs–External Political Relations |PTER – Political Affairs–Terrorists and Terrorism | QA – Qatar | RU – RussiaConcepts:— Not Assigned —Enclosure: — Not Assigned — Type: TE Office Origin: — N/A or Blank — Office Action: — N/A or Blank — Archive Status: — Not Assigned — From:United Arab Emirates Abu DhabiMarkings: — Not Assigned — To:CJCS WASHINGTON DC Defense Intelligence Agency Iran Iran Collective | Joint Chiefs of Staff North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Russia Moscow | Secretary of Defense Secretary of State The Cooperation Council for the Arab States of the Gulf United States Central Command 

Documents